Comments by Quasar Framework (@quasarframework) - Honouree

Quasar Framework

quasar-framework.org

Sagittarius-A

Super-Powered Development (not just for Web)

@quasarframework 0

over 7 years ago

Typo: "coding with Qusar framework" --- but otherwise a huge honour, thank you!

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

over 7 years ago

Those aren't lines of "dead code" - it is actually the hack at work. :)

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

over 7 years ago

We know that testimonials aren't the biggest bringer of new content out there - but in this case we posted it from the official channel beca

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

over 7 years ago

Hey - super nice! Did you make a PR to the quasar-framework/quasar-awesome( repo on Githu

1

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

Well, next notch in your belt is going to be an IPFS pinning service with storage and massive high-water, I would say. Keep up the great wor

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

Świetna robota, dziękuję!

1

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

!عمل رائع ، الشكر

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

You should check the issues on the git repo. They found what looks like a type error within dsteem, it seems.

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

And this is why we are using this kind of "confident" language:

2

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

@didic - perfect means without flaw, like the C-note of a tuning fork or the sound of two leaded-crystal champagne flutes "prosting" each ot

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

:D @didic - I would have posted this in development, but I was informed that such an update wasn't appropriate as several different people c

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

Good to see you are progressing here! Don’t forget the community at the Quasar Discord Server are there to help you!

1

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

We would prefer "kontrybutor". Thanks!!!

0

0

0.000

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

I know what you mean, but I am trying to focus my thoughts. Be less wordy, use shorter sentences. I'll find the sweet spot soon. Thanks for

2

0

0.097

@quasarframework 0

almost 8 years ago

I don’t agree with you about the FOSS conclusion you made, because although sub-licensing MIT is valid, it contradicts the spirit of open so

1

0

0.031