Comments by jamesmart - Honouree

jamesmart

almost 4 years ago

Great thoughts as usual, Tadas.

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@jamesmart, @doingitright, @mattlangston, @shakhruz, @daodejing, @westreich

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@daodejing, @jamesmart, @westreich, @hachtu, @cacxyz @maximcincinnatis

2

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

Because the choice of solution is consequential and left unspecified, we recommend that Team fractally add to their specification an addit

1

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@jamesmart, @hachtu, @val, @khoja, @zeos, @novacryptollc

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@jamesmart, @mikelennie,@novacryptollc, @artdapp, @norsegaud, @gokulnk

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

I completely agree. The goal of mechanism design is not to engineer any particular outcomes, it is to design credibly neutral incentive sys

1

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

...knowledge of the network and capacity to predict community consensus are more correlated with attendance than with level attained. I'm

1

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

I believe that the 12 people according to this proposal are those 12 with the highest weekly averages out of those who attended the round 2

1

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

Had 5, and then one dropped out from a bad connection

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@jamesmart, @lionflash, @val, @thomashallgren, @cryptokens, @tseyt

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@jamesmart, @stan, @thomashallgren, @sim31

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@fractallymike, @wildwex, @jamesmart, @cvrizzos108x, @pnc, @zeos

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@fractallymike, @wildwex, @jamesmart, @cvrizzos108x, @pnc, @zeos

0

0

0.000

almost 4 years ago

@aguerrido, @dansingjoy, @jamesmart, @westreich, @grahappa, @markstair

0

0

0.000