Comments by cardeegel - Honouree

cardeegel

22 days ago

It reads like it, but just to be sure. The 0.5% go to the liquidity provider a.k.a DAO, right? No burning nonsense, right?

2

0

0.000

26 days ago

My understanding is, that the DAO never offered a bounty to begin with. There was no agreement beforehand and I read somewhere that original

0

0

0.000

about 1 month ago

To be used as in to be sold or to be used as lottery prizes in some form?

0

0

0.000

about 2 months ago

Some more data: A lot of DEC is burned throughout the ecosystem through market fees, land LPs, wild pass, etc. While this varies wildly dep

1

0

0.000

about 2 months ago

I will add some argumentation I collected for a proposal to stop the burn, I didn't run in the end because of the development with the DAO t

3

0

0.000

2 months ago

My bigger question about all this is what the DAO is going to do with the codebase. I guess proposals will have to follow, how this is going

0

0

0.000

3 months ago

Apart from minimum card levels being terrible, I would also suggest less brackets. The playerbase is not that big to begin with and splittin

1

0

0.000

3 months ago

First of all, I appreciate the effort and I like the idea of limiting the maximum level of cards, but forcing a minimum level is just terrib

3

0

0.000

4 months ago

Does land really need more general boosts? There are millions more resources produced than consumed each and every day. The only thing which

1

0

0.000

4 months ago

I would say if you use reward chests payed for by glint can use potions they should be buyable with glint. It's not like you can buy all the

0

0

0.000

4 months ago

My understanding was always that modern cards have the penalty and cards no longer playable in modern don't. Otherwise modern cards are just

0

0

0.000

5 months ago

This sum.. I mean archon + Rush Townsend = 2x5 range damage in round 0 (and likely another 2x5 immediately after due to the high speed). 20

1

0

0.000

6 months ago

I don't try to approach it from a position of trying to do a different proposal. I already voted for this, because it is better than not hav

0

0

0.000

6 months ago

At the risk of being annoying with it, this makes it again a bit more complicated than it has to be. A card having a CP score, a PP score, n

0

0

0.000

6 months ago

I like what I read for the most part, but it is again so many small things packed together in one big yes or no proposal. I don't think spl

7

0

0.014