The Mother of all Game Changers: Central Banks will start buying if Cryptocurrency tops $500 Billion

avatar
(Edited)

At least that is the latest conclusion from one top Wall Street Strategist. 

Tom Lee is the first major Wall Street Strategist to issue a report solely dedicated to Bitcoin and Bitcoin's future price.

Ironically, Lee has been one of the most bullish strategists on the US stock market over the last several years, but just recently has turned to one of the most bearish on the street. 

His price targets for Bitcoin are anything but bearish...

Tom Lee predicts that based on his models, Bitcoin could hit $20,000-$55,000 by the year 2022.

Yes that is quite a large range, but either way, that represents massive returns from current levels. 

Some might read this as just another analyst throwing out some numbers to see his name in the headlines. However, I have followed Tom Lee for some time now dating back to my time trading stocks for a private equity fund, and he's the real deal. 

This guy has been right an awful lot and I encourage you to go back and look at some of his recent calls. You will find that he is right far more often than he is wrong. 

How does Lee get to that price target, you may ask? 

According to Lee it's quite simple:

"We believe that one of the drivers of Bitcoin prices is that cryptocurrencies are cannibalizing the demand for gold. Based on this premise we can take a stab at establishing a valuation framework for Bitcoin. Based on our model, we estimate that Bitcoin's value per unit could be $20,000 to $55,000 by 2022."

Gold's total market value is $7.5 trillion, which is substantially higher than Bitcoin's current $41 Billion. 

That is all well and good but then when you look at good ol' supply and demand, things start to swing in favor of Bitcoin.

The current supply of Gold is surging as mining has been soaring to new all time highs. As the price of gold goes up, more supply comes on to the market thus pulling the reigns as price increases. 

Bitcoin is exactly the opposite. 

As time goes by the supply of Bitcoins keeps slowing. The total number of Bitcoins ever created will be 21 million, and it will reach that number by roughly 2040. It will actually reach 98% of that number by 2030.

Basically the supply of gold is ever increasing and the supply of Bitcoin is ever decreasing. 

The supply of Gold to outpace the supply of Bitcoin

According to Lee, a simulation shows that Bitcoin supply will start growing slower than gold's as soon as 2020, all the while with a much smaller market cap. 

The constraints on Bitcoin's supply is a big reason for it's potential. Combined that with ever increasing use cases and you have the potential for a digital currency with high demand and a limited supply, which will drive up prices. 

While the supply and demand aspect will get it part of the way to his price target, Lee says there is one aspect that really will be a game changer...

According to Lee, Central Banks will start buying digital currencies when/if the total market value eclipses $500 Billion.

As part of his thoughts, Lee referenced a recent news article about Central Banks looking into the possibility of owning digital currencies. 

It can be read here:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-28/rise-of-digital-coins-has-central-banks-considering-e-versions

According to Lee, this will be the real game changer when they start to get involved in a big way. 

It will enhance the legitimacy of the currencies as well as likely accelerate the substitution of cryptocurrencies for gold by investors.

Conclusion:

Basically, substantial upside exists in owning digital currencies at current prices. :) 

Stay informed my friends!

Sources:

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/07/07/strategist-tom-lee-weighs-sees-bitcoin-going-as-high-as-55000.html

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-28/rise-of-digital-coins-has-central-banks-considering-e-versions

Image Sources:

http://thinkaboutnow.com/2016/06/the-horrendous-truth-about-central-banking/

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/finanace/german-central-bank-warns-not-use-bitcoin-not-backed-central-bank/

http://www.cnbc.com/2017/05/02/theres-a-strange-disconnect-in-the-market-warns-strategist-tom-lee.html

https://www.technologyreview.com/s/600980/a-bitcoin-style-currency-for-central-banks/

Follow me: @jrcornel



0
0
0.000
104 comments
avatar

BTC is great.. no one can stop it..

0
0
0.000
avatar

Of course the banks are going to buy them, they are afraid of losing their power. And of course they will lend bitcoin that they do not have to earn interest. In any case it is necessary to hold. I will follow you because I like your news.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Banks are trying to create their own... Ethereum.
Bitcoin for the people!

0
0
0.000
avatar

this is why one should be wary of both Ethereum and Ripple. (Maybe equally wary of Stellar, too.) Getting into and holding the real thing, meaning truly decentralized peer-to-peer Crypto coins is the way to go and be safe from that whole government fiat show!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Etherum is from bank? I am fan of Litecoin.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Over 30 large corporations such as Microsoft, Intel, ING and JP Morgan Chase have formed an alliance around the blockchain-based financial system Ethereum the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance (EEA.)

Smells like and looks like the illuminati is written all over it. Could be a good reason to invest and ride the wave since they are going to push it.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Great news!
Just saw this in my first Chat Room peak...Resteem!:)

0
0
0.000
avatar

Just remember that once they start buying into the market, they can begin price manipulation. Be wary my friends.

0
0
0.000
avatar

there is no straight forward way to value crypto. Nice article

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Not sure how gold and bitcoin could be compared since the first is manipulated af. Anyway really interesting stuff going on around cryptocoins. Great article @jrcornel!

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

It probably has to do with it's classification as an asset as opposed to a currency by most governments. In that regard it is more comparable to gold than to other currencies.

0
0
0.000
avatar

You better believe banks are already buying crypto.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If banks start buying crypto currency, its price will be just above the clouds!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Nice post I like with your post

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is interesting how they do go hand and hand. I sold a lot of my silver stack to buy into crypto and I am not going anywhere. I don't even look at silver coins anymore. I am addicted to this now! There is correlation!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I saw there was a silver crash flash crash the other day, hopefully you were out before having to stomach that!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I still have a couple hundred ounces nothing much. I had too much anyway! It is way too bulky, you have to keep it in a safety deposit box. I am 40 and the funniest thing is explaining crypto to my parents in their early 70's. Just funny!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I too bought in heavily to the precious metals craze in 2011 or so. The world was full of doom and gloomers and I was going to make a fortune! The problem with precious metals is to make that fortune you have to pray for world anarchy (Zombie apocalypse). With crypto that is not the case as the newer more efficient currencies are starting to be a faster, cheaper way to do business and not just a store of wealth. (my own personal experience of this is the difference between using crypto to send money overseas vs going down to my local bank. You will lose at least $20 and your mind doing it!) My parents would certainly have understood that.
I am 50 and I keep my gold and silver and grow my crypto balances by converting paper into crypto. I think both have value but for different reasons.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

If I may, please allow me to dispute a couple of your assertions. First of all what you describe is chaos, not anarchy which is a condition of self-governance. It literally means without "archy" or systematized rule such as monarchy, oligarchy, whatever. See here:http://www.dictionary.com/browse/-archy Secondly, chaos is not necessary for silver and gold to reflect their true values. All that is necessary is a free and fair market without intervention from the globalist banking cartel. I'm not against cryptocurrencies. What is appealing about cryptos is that they are equity based, not debt based like all the central bank currencies of the world today. If you don't know what that means then you should investigate it. A good place to start would be www.positivemoney.org Beyond this, cryptos are, at least for now now, outside the globalist banking cartel's control. But that will change when derivative contracts start trading on cryptos and when central banks start buying it or issuing their own. The LAST thing crypto investors should want is any kind of involvement by the banking cartel because it will only be for the purpose of infiltrating, compromising and controlling it, putting humanity right back in the cartel-controlled box.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm glad that you brought this up. I remember reading years back how major banking institutions would adopt the block chain and I though to myself, well that's bitter sweet. Although, I think that crypto and the block chain were designed as a way to break free from central and global banking mafias, it's almost inevitable that both parties will merge. However, this doesn't have to be a bad thing and I am glad to see the people shaping the demand for transparency and sustainability which is simultaneously forcing institutions to reinstate their value systems they should've had a long time ago.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Touché @Maxam. I understand that modern currencies are underwritten by debt however I do not see why Digital currencies are necessarily equity based . I will look up the link you provided thank you. As for precious metals being manipulated I would 100% agree particularly silver. However It is still better to have it than not because in the unlikely event that the current "Archy" folds then PM prices will float without interference. So it is a perfect hedge. They are artificially holding the price low and we are acquiring a physical commodity cheaply. I just don't wish for the time when we will profit from it.

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Cryptocurrencies are "equity based" because their creation is the result of work and investment - algorithm solutions, mining equipment investment and electricity. Bank created currencies are debt based. They exist only because someone somewhere took out a loan from a bank. The money received from that loan is simultaneously the borrower's debt and the bank's asset. The borrower then pays someone else from the money borrowed, thereby doubling the amount of money in the banking system. This new deposit will be used as an accounting entry reserve which will be used to justify additional loans to create additional debt money. And the process continues ad infinitum, creating enormous bank profits out of thin air from this fractional reserve, debt based, bank money system. In our present system, all money is debt. Welcome to systematized enslavement by debt.

0
0
0.000
avatar

That is hilarious! I have the same problem when I try to explain crypto to my parents. They probably think I'm crazy haha.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'll be pro crypto till I die and this news is just good news to me. yes, the limited and unmodifiable supply of Bitcoin makes it an attractive store of value... there's also one factor to consider: the rising population of humans, who add value to currency... the more people are born, the more value there is and the more demand for Bitcoin, which leads to higher prices... thanks for sharing your thoughts.

0
0
0.000
avatar

If the markets ever find out that only just a first Central Bank started buying Bitcoins: Moon.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good news for crypto lovers....

0
0
0.000
avatar

I think central bankers will probably be late to the game. If market cap hits $500 billion, it will be because of private sector drivers. I also think that price estimate for 2022 is a bit conservative if people really do substitute BTC for gold in the coming years. The market for asset conserving instruments is about to explode during this time. Gold will probably explode as well. As government fiat begins to crumble we'll see a rush to safety. Up until now that has largely meant USD, but that too will fall at some point as more Vallejos and Chicagos continue to manifest. People will be scrambling for any place to put their money except government fiat.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Good points. I am betting on him and you being right ;)

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

you're totally right -- previous bubbles and their bursting (from Dot-com's in 2001 to Real Estate's in 2007) are living proof of that.

With the advent of Crypto, there will be myriad new markets outside Fiat in this entire new asset class of its own to invest in, and with people scrambling to get in on that one prices will inevitably do very nicely! Good for everyone getting in early.

0
0
0.000
avatar

A wonderful publication Greetings to wish you a beautiful day Please support me on my page

0
0
0.000
avatar

I know I'm going to keep on holding on to my bitcoins so that in the future I can sell them for those figures :D! Great post

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very interesting article. Thanks for sharing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

well i agree to some extent thta bitcoin will pass 50k in the next years thanks for this post i had to follow you

0
0
0.000
avatar

Some people say that by 2020 bitcoin would be the hundred thousands

0
0
0.000
avatar

too late, they should have invested earlier if they wanted too. Lets see what happens, it will be beneficial for us either way

0
0
0.000
avatar

Gold is also traded in the futures market. There are now 293 paper ounces traded for every ounce of physical gold.

This allows for massive manipulation. Banks can bang the bid all day long especially during low liquidity market hours and crush the price down.

With Bitcoin this is not possible.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I made a very similar prediction just days before that guy said it. My prediction was $20,000-$50,000 by 2021. I'm leaning more towards $20,000 not because Bitcoin couldn't reach $50,000 if everything went smoothly, but because I think Bitcoin's share of the cryptocurrency market will continue to fall in relation to other cryptocurrencies. If that weren't to happen, then it could reach $50,000. But I think many great altcoins are yet to appear, and some of the existing ones, like ETH, will continue to mature and evolve, and potentially surpass Bitcoin in many ways. However, I still expect Bitcoin to remain top coin until 2020 or so.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Ive been telling people for a while how undervalued cryptocurrencies are, and i think a large number of people assume that im trying to hype it up when i say these things, people dont understand that rich people are taking notice and are now talking about cryptos in a positive light, which is a HUGE market indication that they own large stake in the coins now

If bitcoin and ethereum mining continues how its been going over the last few years and shows no sign of stopping, its LOGICAL that the prices will continue to rise, we havent seen ANYTHING yet.

i read a few days ago that ethereum will eventually hit 3,000 a coin, and nothing about that surprises me, if you havent been paying attention, i hope you are now, because billionaires are about to be made

0
0
0.000
avatar

I'm not sure why a central bank would buy crypto currency. That makes no sense from a monetary policy standpoint. If they buy cryptos, they have to sell their own currencies, which makes the value of them go down. Since one of the primary goals of any modern central bank is price stability, their purchase of cryptos seems unlikely. I get and agree with his arguement about substitution of gold with cryptos as a store of value, but his central bank prediction is very flimsy.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My guess is that it has to do with most government's classification of Bitcoin as an asset similar to gold as opposed to a currency. I would imagine they would buy virtual currencies for the same reason they buy gold?

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

The reason central banks might buy cryptos is to have a supply which can be used to short it for price control purposes. The only other reason would be if they are either overtly or covertly behind the creation of one or more cryptos using them as a way to further consolidate their economic and social control. It is easily conceivable that the central banking cartel does indeed want the public to adopt cryptocurrencies, but their end game will involve cryptos that track and control every human being in a new form of technotronic enslavement. Those who love liberty will love cryptocurrencies which are in no way connected to the banking system.

0
0
0.000
avatar

To short an asset, you borrow it and then sell it. I'm not getting the buy to short rationale. I think @jrcornel has a more plausible explanation. If a crypto becomes some sort of international reserve currency, then I could see central banks as owners. I'm not buying the technotronic enslavement conspiracy of the central banking cartel. The central banks of the world have not been able to agree on a lot in recent decades. Look at Basel banking regulations, post 2008 crisis monetary policy, etc.

0
0
0.000
avatar

i can see they will have too invest into crypto - do you think it would be bitcoin?

0
0
0.000
avatar

well i hope it touches the upper end of the projected rate...

0
0
0.000
avatar

We don't need banksters. Crypto is already manipulated with whales and imagine if banksters pop in. It will be carnage. Yes, we might get a more stable market but that stabillity will be sustainable only if it fits their market manipulations and needs. We need more common people in this sea not banks and already too powerful people. Crypto was created to oppose those!

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

Well, that's a new one. May be the banks have been realising the real value of cryptocurrency but still there's nothing which can affect bitcoin pricing in the short term. Crypto currency are highly volatile as it is decentralized. It means it is controlled by common man and people will always use it for their own benefit. Nowadays the market is in kinda recession because people are panicking over segwit hype. So, there will always be hype about bitcoin and there will always be falling and rising of market. Banks will not be able to do anything. May be in future government would centralize it, then what would people do?
Thanks for the article though @jrcornel

0
0
0.000
avatar

I tend to the version that it will be something like this. Thanks for info!

0
0
0.000
avatar

The increasing value of Bitcoin is all very logical as a store of value, all currencies are decreasing annually. It is the same logic as holding a rare art piece for example.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Exciting potential. HODL my friends.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Guys don't be so positive about this. Why do you think somebody important from Wall Street "decreseases" value of metals like gold/silver? It's obvious, they want you to sell precious metals (check the history of the US why) and migrate to btc, which doesn't work when internet is out.

When war happens and internet is outyour silver coin can get you some help, your btc will be dead because of dead internet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Bitcoin works even without the internet, albeit prices would likely be affected medium-term due to market shock. Could recover though, admittedly it's uncharted territory for Crypto so anything could happen.

Another point to consider: mesh networks will mushroom in that scenario, possibly taking care of Crypto even without the need to go internet-less there (think iOS' capability of P2P communications, as demonstrated in Hong Kong protests earlier)...

0
0
0.000
avatar

Very positive...maybe it also has to do with "timing" of all they still needs to be done for some type off transition? Either way this is very positve. Thank you for sharing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great new for Crypto lovers. Thanks for sharing.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Greetings brother, I do not know because I still think that cryptocurrency are going to be dominating the world markets ,,,, (it is a question of time) to the step that we are already many countries that begin to work with the digital coins, and the truth Would come this very well, only that there is an important question? Will governments look for ways to have control over currencies? Until the moments can not have control of the same, but that will be until when? Since the great dominion that will have these currencies in a not too distant future is going to be giant ,,,, hope that they remain uninterrupted

0
0
0.000
avatar

Central banks don't have a choice. It's happening soon

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is amazing for the cryptocurrency evolution hope it will reach it thanks a lot for sharing and keep on posting ;)

0
0
0.000
avatar

This is a really great post, but I'm wondering, how do we know they aren't buying it now? I kind of think they might be already.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I haven´t bought any cryptos yet. My first experience, and my starting point, is Steemit. I am starting to consider buying some Steem. Besides investing in cryptos, I would be bettering myself in the community.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It will enhance the legitimacy of the currencies as well as likely accelerate the substitution of cryptocurrencies for gold by investors.

I would add that, in my opinion, it will also accelerate the death spiral of the fiat currencies they've been inflating to "stimulate" the economy.

Nothing starts a run on a bank as fast as the central banks starting to by that "crazy" crypto-stuff that they've been pounding for years. Oh, we're buying it but you should stick with U$D.

0
0
0.000
avatar

It is very hard to predict the price. I wish 50 000 USD per Bitcoin, but it is still very risky. Bitcoin can go down back to 500 USD.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Given the current situation, if you compare to lets say the dot com bubble it is highly unlikely to go back to 500 USD at this stage, we have a long way to go as it hasn't even reached its full potential yet.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I just got 50 oz of silver at the low prices we are seeing today. I think both markets are correlated.

0
0
0.000
avatar

that would be an interesting concept. Of course the government could smother a crypto-currency if it buys too much! Especially one with a fixed amount of supply like BTC

0
0
0.000
avatar

the BTC and the other cryptocurrencies incluying steem is the future of the mundial economy

0
0
0.000
avatar

I like the article but it raises questions. I wonder what would be the purpose of owning bitcoin except as a reserve like gold itself. No need to pay to maintain Fort Knox?
If the feds develop their own version then to be useful they would have to be able to regulate the supply both up and down to manipulate monetary policy. Which is something that specifically attracted people to decentralized currencies in the first place. Why would the Feds want to devalue their own currency by printing it to buy Bitcoin? I can see the incentive for foreign Feds to do this because they can hold reserves in something that is not controlled by the US but at the same time not controlled by any other country either. So it becomes the popular choice based on mutual distrust as apposed to trust ..

0
0
0.000
avatar

central banks have unlimited fiat, basically they can just take over every blockchain thats against them if they want to. It will make a few people immensely rich (enter othet govt agencies to take fiat back from them) but it keeps the status quo.

0
0
0.000
avatar

I read that as: they want to convince people to buy crypto with gold. And gold will fall. At which point they suck in all the cheap gold.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Woah! Things are starting to get interesting now. It's just a matter of time now, I guess.

0
0
0.000
avatar

My eldest brother would give this two thumbs and two big toes up if he were to read this. VERY ACCURATE!

Me, I am just the little sister and I am learning... but you are helping me to go back to my brothers wiser... hehe - so a big thank you for that :)

I wrote about them and all their "cryptosation" earlier....

https://steemit.com/life/@jaynie/curry-cousins-and-more-crypto-welcome-to-my-world-4

if you have a gap... you might appreciate the male/female dynamic. lol :)

again, greatly helpful info. thank you!

0
0
0.000
avatar

Thanks for sharing.
just a great news

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great Post! We can see BITCOIN reaching 20K - 50K+ by 2020 and beyond. This is an excellent article we are now following you @jrcornel keep up the great work.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Silver will always have a fungible value, black listed Bitcoins cant say the same thing. Silver also has many technological applications....I like it all, I buy and trade it all, you just need to be aware and paying attention...

0
0
0.000
avatar

It looks like it could get to 500 billion pretty soon. I'm predicting within the next 2 years and everyone who got in early (like all of us) will reap the rewards. The current overall market cap is nothing compared to what it can be once the general public realize what's going on.

0
0
0.000
avatar

Great article and loved that you attributed your sources. Those were also some great reads as well!

0
0
0.000
avatar

I will now be following you and Mr. Lee. Thanks for the update. 🐓🐓

0
0
0.000
avatar

The first time I heard him talk on CNBC I thought he sounded like a timid child, then when he turned out to be right I paid a little more attention the next time. Then he was right again... now he has won me over. :)

0
0
0.000
avatar
(Edited)

The only issue I see with crypto is that there are so many platforms popping up daily, how do you decide which one to choose from. I.E. Bitcoin is the Gold standard but you also have Litecoin, Ethereum, Ripple, Steem, etc. I would love to buy Steem as it's still cheap but it seems to be a gamble to me.
At some point, I anticipate these smaller guys will crash because I don't see businesses taking hundreds of crypto currencies as a form of payment. While I know Bitcoin is the standard, something is going to have to give to make this a legitimate worldwide currency or there needs to be a better inter-exchange market available.

0
0
0.000